PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIV vs. AOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIV vs. AOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MDIV has underperformed AOR with an annualized return of 4.73%, while AOR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.


MDIV

1D
0.50%
1M
0.27%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.59%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
4.73%

AOR

1D
0.22%
1M
3.07%
YTD
7.96%
6M
8.80%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
8.39%3.77%10.05%11.50%-3.86%16.51%-14.84%18.59%-5.78%5.61%
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
7.96%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-5.82%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and AOR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012

0.67

The correlation between MDIV and AOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDIV vs. AOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDIV
AOR

Financial Services

22.4%
16.2%

Real Estate

21.6%
2.4%

Energy

17.6%
4.3%

Utilities

9.6%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.2%
9.5%

Healthcare

1.6%
8.0%

Industrials

1.6%
11.9%

Basic Materials

0.7%
4.2%

Technology

-

27.8%

Financial Services

MDIV
22.4%
AOR
16.2%

Real Estate

MDIV
21.6%
AOR
2.4%

Energy

MDIV
17.6%
AOR
4.3%

Utilities

MDIV
9.6%
AOR
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

MDIV
8.0%
AOR
5.0%

Communication Services

MDIV
3.2%
AOR
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MDIV
3.2%
AOR
9.5%

Healthcare

MDIV
1.6%
AOR
8.0%

Industrials

MDIV
1.6%
AOR
11.9%

Basic Materials

MDIV
0.7%
AOR
4.2%

Technology

MDIV

-

AOR
27.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIV vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV
MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIVAORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.41

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

3.43

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.08

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.75

13.48

-3.73

MDIV vs. AOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and AOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIVAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.41

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.80

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.69

-0.34

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than AOR's maximum drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and AOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIVAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-24.44%

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.39%

-6.64%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.62%

-9.77%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.02%

-21.72%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-22.95%

-25.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-3.48%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.52%

-0.31%

Volatility

MDIV vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) is 1.55%, while iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that MDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIVAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

2.70%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

6.81%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.67%

8.40%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.93%

10.55%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

10.67%

+4.56%

MDIV vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIV vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF
2.46%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
MDIV
First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund
6.35%6.51%6.40%6.08%6.71%5.30%6.00%5.90%6.76%6.04%6.35%7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIV and AOR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOR has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to MDIV (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs AOR's -24.44%.

On 10-year performance, AOR leads with 8.46% vs 4.73% for MDIV. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AOR has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 2.46% for AOR.

MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index, while AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 0.25% for AOR.

AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIV and AOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer