MDISX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
MDISX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDISX Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund | -4.27% | 23.75% | 6.38% | 20.48% | -4.73% | 19.60% | -4.38% | 24.74% | -10.86% | 7.22% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MDISX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
MDISX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDISX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MDISX
FGIAX
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDISX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.75 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | 2.26 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 2.61 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 12.12 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDISX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.75 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.80 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.42 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDISX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.02%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDISX Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund | 11.02% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.12% | 10.29% | 8.75% | 3.50% | 7.21% | 7.50% | 2.97% | 4.13% | 7.77% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDISX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -49.35% | +9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -8.29% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.57% | -21.08% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.15% | -38.02% | -2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -3.78% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -7.22% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.78% | +1.34% |
Volatility
MDISX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that MDISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDISX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.05% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 7.09% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 12.28% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 13.08% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 15.17% | +1.90% |