PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MDISX has underperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 8.60%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return.


MDISX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.65%
6M
4.78%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
8.60%

GCOW

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
12.82%
6M
14.84%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
1.65%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%19.60%-4.38%24.74%-10.86%7.22%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.82%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and GCOW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.82

The correlation between MDISX and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDISXGCOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

2.55

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

3.66

-1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

5.98

-4.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

15.85

-11.40

MDISX vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDISXGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.55

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.94

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.62

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.59

+0.22

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-37.64%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-4.77%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-12.35%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-21.48%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-37.64%

-2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

-2.18%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.84%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.80%

+1.44%

Volatility

MDISX vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.94%. This indicates that MDISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.94%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

7.97%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

10.82%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

13.48%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.20%

+0.91%

MDISX vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDISX vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, more than GCOW's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.41%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.38%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and GCOW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDISX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to GCOW (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer