PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDGL vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDGL vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDGL achieves a -15.37% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 96.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MDGL has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 43.64%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.89% annualized return.


MDGL

1D
0.96%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
-15.37%
6M
-15.93%
1Y
76.44%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
37.28%
10Y*
43.64%

LRCX

1D
-2.12%
1M
21.98%
YTD
96.76%
6M
114.41%
1Y
299.76%
3Y*
78.82%
5Y*
40.19%
10Y*
46.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDGL vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDGL
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-15.37%88.72%33.36%-20.28%242.52%-23.77%22.02%-19.17%22.80%516.04%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
96.76%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-24.40%76.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MDGL and LRCX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2007

0.24

The correlation between MDGL and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDGL:

$14.31B

LRCX:

$424.82B

EPS

MDGL:

-$12.87

LRCX:

$5.29

PS Ratio

MDGL:

10.46

LRCX:

19.68

PB Ratio

MDGL:

26.33

LRCX:

40.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDGL:

$1.13B

LRCX:

$21.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDGL:

$1.05B

LRCX:

$10.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDGL:

-$287.63M

LRCX:

$6.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDGL vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDGL
MDGL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MDGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDGL vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDGLLRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.65

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

15.09

-12.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

51.29

-45.38

MDGL vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 6.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDGL and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDGLLRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

6.05

-4.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.88

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

1.06

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.43

-0.41

Drawdowns

MDGL vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDGL drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDGL and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDGLLRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.40%

-87.90%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-20.01%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.45%

-47.10%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.41%

-56.39%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.19%

-56.39%

-25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.25%

-2.12%

-16.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-28.19%

-30.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.99%

5.88%

+7.11%

Volatility

MDGL vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) have volatilities of 16.08% and 15.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDGLLRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.08%

15.57%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.56%

40.27%

-8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.96%

49.95%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.42%

45.94%

+87.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.50%

44.58%

+72.92%

Dividends

MDGL vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

MDGL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.30%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
MDGL
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MDGL vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
311.34M
5.84B
(MDGL) Total Revenue
(LRCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDGL vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
91.4%
49.8%
Portfolio components
MDGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 284.49M and revenue of 311.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.4%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

MDGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of -92.72M and revenue of 311.34M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.8%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

MDGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of -94.39M and revenue of 311.34M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MDGL and LRCX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDGL has higher volatility (16.08%) compared to LRCX (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDGL dropped -98.40% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.05 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDGL and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer