MCHI vs. NORW
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while NORW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 4.76%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for NORW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NORW.
Performance
MCHI vs. NORW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 23.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 4.76%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.18% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.76%
NORW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 28.35%
- 1Y
- 27.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
MCHI vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -8.72% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 23.78% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and NORW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MCHI and NORW has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MCHI vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCHI
NORW
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
MCHI
NORW
Financial Services
MCHI
NORW
Communication Services
MCHI
NORW
Technology
MCHI
NORW
Basic Materials
MCHI
NORW
Healthcare
MCHI
NORW
-
Industrials
MCHI
NORW
Energy
MCHI
NORW
Consumer Defensive
MCHI
NORW
Utilities
MCHI
NORW
Real Estate
MCHI
NORW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
NORW
MCHI vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 2.99 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 8.18 | -8.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and NORW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -35.62% | -27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.51% | -9.18% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -16.06% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -32.78% | -24.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -33.86% | -29.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.76% | -5.47% | -32.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -10.12% | -14.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 3.35% | +5.46% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.35%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 4.35% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 13.08% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.23% | 16.91% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.72% | 21.91% | +8.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.38% | 20.78% | +6.60% |
MCHI vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than NORW's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.32% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.78% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and NORW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCHI has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to NORW (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs NORW's -35.62%.
On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 10.18% vs 4.76% for MCHI. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 10.18% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.32% for MCHI.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while NORW is Europe Equities. MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.50% for NORW.
NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and NORW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer