MCHI vs. NORW
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHI is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Index, while NORW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 3.79%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for NORW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NORW.
Performance
MCHI vs. NORW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -9.37% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 18.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 3.79%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- -12.93%
- YTD
- -9.37%
- 1Y
- -4.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.28%
NORW
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- YTD
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 26.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.60%
MCHI vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -9.37% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 18.36% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and NORW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MCHI and NORW shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MCHI vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCHI
NORW
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
MCHI
NORW
Communication Services
MCHI
NORW
Financial Services
MCHI
NORW
Technology
MCHI
NORW
Industrials
MCHI
NORW
Healthcare
MCHI
NORW
-
Basic Materials
MCHI
NORW
Energy
MCHI
NORW
Consumer Defensive
MCHI
NORW
Utilities
MCHI
NORW
Real Estate
MCHI
NORW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
NORW
MCHI vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.26 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.83 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 5.89 | -6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and NORW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -35.62% | -27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -14.49% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -16.06% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.66% | -32.78% | -20.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -33.86% | -29.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.20% | -9.61% | -28.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.64% | -10.13% | -14.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.78% | 4.49% | +6.29% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 5.55%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 5.55% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 14.15% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 17.30% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 21.99% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 20.54% | +6.81% |
MCHI vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than NORW's 7.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 7.60% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHI and NORW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCHI has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to NORW (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs NORW's -35.62%.
On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.22% vs 3.79% for MCHI. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 2.03% for MCHI.
MCHI is categorized as China Equities, while NORW is Europe Equities. MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.50% for NORW.
NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and NORW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer