PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. EIRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. EIRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than EIRL's 7.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NORW having a 9.95% annualized return and EIRL not far behind at 9.70%.


NORW

1D
0.96%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
18.59%
6M
20.67%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
9.95%

EIRL

1D
0.67%
1M
5.40%
YTD
7.44%
6M
6.55%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NORW vs. EIRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
18.59%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
7.44%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and EIRL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2010

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and EIRL has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NORW vs. EIRL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
EIRL

Energy

27.3%
4.5%

Financial Services

22.9%
38.6%

Industrials

14.7%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
19.0%

Basic Materials

11.5%
0.7%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Technology

4.4%
0.3%

Utilities

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
8.5%

Healthcare

-

10.3%

Energy

NORW
27.3%
EIRL
4.5%

Financial Services

NORW
22.9%
EIRL
38.6%

Industrials

NORW
14.7%
EIRL
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
12.1%
EIRL
19.0%

Basic Materials

NORW
11.5%
EIRL
0.7%

Communication Services

NORW
5.9%
EIRL

-

Technology

NORW
4.4%
EIRL
0.3%

Utilities

NORW
0.6%
EIRL

-

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
EIRL
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.2%
EIRL
8.5%

Healthcare

NORW

-

EIRL
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. EIRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NORW vs. EIRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NORWEIRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.55

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

5.10

+1.90

NORW vs. EIRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the EIRL Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and EIRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NORW vs. EIRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum EIRL drawdown of -46.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and EIRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWEIRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-46.48%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-14.28%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-23.04%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-40.14%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-46.48%

+12.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

0.00%

-9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-9.08%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

4.33%

-1.00%

Volatility

NORW vs. EIRL - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) at 3.52%. This indicates that NORW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWEIRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

3.52%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

14.96%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

18.04%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

21.17%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

21.69%

-0.92%

NORW vs. EIRL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EIRL's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. EIRL - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than EIRL's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.42%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.90%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and EIRL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NORW has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to EIRL (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs EIRL's -46.48%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.95% vs 9.70% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.42% for EIRL.

NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.49% for EIRL.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and EIRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer