PortfoliosLab logo
MCHI vs. CNYA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCHI and CNYA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

MCHI vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
48.24%
32.07%
MCHI
CNYA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MCHI:

0.88

CNYA:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

MCHI:

1.42

CNYA:

0.58

Omega Ratio

MCHI:

1.19

CNYA:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

MCHI:

0.55

CNYA:

0.17

Martin Ratio

MCHI:

2.28

CNYA:

0.44

Ulcer Index

MCHI:

13.37%

CNYA:

18.51%

Daily Std Dev

MCHI:

34.81%

CNYA:

33.91%

Max Drawdown

MCHI:

-62.84%

CNYA:

-49.48%

Current Drawdown

MCHI:

-41.74%

CNYA:

-38.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than CNYA's -2.33% return.


MCHI

YTD

10.78%

1M

-5.62%

6M

6.12%

1Y

27.88%

5Y*

-0.82%

10Y*

-0.30%

CNYA

YTD

-2.33%

1M

-3.23%

6M

-5.64%

1Y

7.58%

5Y*

1.39%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCHI vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CNYA: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CNYA: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for MCHI: current value is 0.59%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
MCHI: 0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCHI vs. CNYA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCHI is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCHI is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCHI is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCHI is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCHI is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCHI is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CNYA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNYA is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNYA is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNYA is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNYA is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNYA is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNYA is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCHI vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
MCHI: 0.88
CNYA: 0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
MCHI: 1.42
CNYA: 0.58
The chart of Omega ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
MCHI: 1.19
CNYA: 1.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
MCHI: 0.55
CNYA: 0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for MCHI, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
MCHI: 2.28
CNYA: 0.44

The current MCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHI and CNYA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.88
0.24
MCHI
CNYA

Dividends

MCHI vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than CNYA's 2.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.08%2.31%3.49%2.16%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%2.35%
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
2.57%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.05%1.21%3.92%0.98%1.38%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MCHI vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.84%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-41.74%
-38.83%
MCHI
CNYA

Volatility

MCHI vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 10.73%. This indicates that MCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.44%
10.73%
MCHI
CNYA