PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NORW vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NORW vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NORW having a 18.59% return and ENOR slightly higher at 18.99%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NORW having a 9.95% annualized return and ENOR not far behind at 9.52%.


NORW

1D
0.96%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
18.59%
6M
20.67%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
9.95%

ENOR

1D
0.89%
1M
-9.16%
YTD
18.99%
6M
20.39%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NORW vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
18.59%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
18.99%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NORW and ENOR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012

0.80

The correlation between NORW and ENOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NORW vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NORW
ENOR

Energy

27.3%
28.0%

Financial Services

22.9%
22.0%

Industrials

14.7%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
12.0%

Basic Materials

11.5%
11.0%

Communication Services

5.9%
6.6%

Technology

4.4%
4.4%

Utilities

0.6%
0.7%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
0.6%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

NORW
27.3%
ENOR
28.0%

Financial Services

NORW
22.9%
ENOR
22.0%

Industrials

NORW
14.7%
ENOR
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

NORW
12.1%
ENOR
12.0%

Basic Materials

NORW
11.5%
ENOR
11.0%

Communication Services

NORW
5.9%
ENOR
6.6%

Technology

NORW
4.4%
ENOR
4.4%

Utilities

NORW
0.6%
ENOR
0.7%

Real Estate

NORW
0.4%
ENOR
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NORW
0.2%
ENOR
0.6%

Healthcare

NORW

-

ENOR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NORW vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NORW vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NORWENORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.11

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

6.91

+0.09

NORW vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NORW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NORW and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NORW vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum ENOR drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NORWENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.62%

-55.35%

+19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-10.91%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-15.84%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.78%

-32.65%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.86%

-54.21%

+20.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

-10.12%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-16.54%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.33%

0.00%

Volatility

NORW vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NORWENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.43%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.39%

14.25%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

17.77%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

22.15%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

23.96%

-3.19%

NORW vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

NORW vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than ENOR's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
5.61%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.90%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


NORW and ENOR have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NORW has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to ENOR (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.95% vs 9.52% for ENOR. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.90% for NORW.

Both ETFs track MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.53% for ENOR.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NORW and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer