PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MCHI vs. CQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MCHI vs. CQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both China Equities funds - MCHI tracks the MSCI China Index while CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 4.22%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for CQQQ. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -6.49% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 4.22%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.48% annualized return.

MCHI

1D
0.54%
1M
9.61%
6M
-9.98%
YTD
-6.49%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
-2.80%
10Y*
4.22%
ALL TIME*
2.49%

CQQQ

1D
1.31%
1M
-6.83%
6M
-9.86%
YTD
-3.27%
1Y
11.64%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
-6.40%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

CQQQ

Invesco China Technology ETF
$60.75M$69.64M$78.22M

MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF
$148.99M$159.51M$173.67M

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF		-6.49%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-21.74%27.78%23.72%-19.79%54.67%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF		-3.27%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHI and CQQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.86

The correlation between MCHI and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MCHI
CQQQ

Consumer Cyclical

22.4%
16.5%

Communication Services

19.3%
24.7%

Financial Services

19.2%
0.5%

Technology

13.9%
57.0%

Industrials

5.4%
1.2%

Healthcare

5.3%

-

Basic Materials

5.1%
0.1%

Energy

3.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

MCHI
22.4%
CQQQ
16.5%

Communication Services

MCHI
19.3%
CQQQ
24.7%

Financial Services

MCHI
19.2%
CQQQ
0.5%

Technology

MCHI
13.9%
CQQQ
57.0%

Industrials

MCHI
5.4%
CQQQ
1.2%

Healthcare

MCHI
5.3%
CQQQ

-

Basic Materials

MCHI
5.1%
CQQQ
0.1%

Energy

MCHI
3.4%
CQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

MCHI
2.9%
CQQQ

-

Utilities

MCHI
1.6%
CQQQ

-

Real Estate

MCHI
1.5%
CQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI China ETF

Invesco China Technology ETF

Often compared with MCHI:
MCHI vs. FXIMCHI vs. KWEBMCHI vs. GXCMCHI vs. ASHRMCHI vs. FLCHMCHI vs. CNYAMCHI vs. VOO
Often compared with CQQQ:
CQQQ vs. KWEBCQQQ vs. FXICQQQ vs. TCHICQQQ vs. VOOCQQQ vs. PGJCQQQ vs. CWEBCQQQ vs. GXC

Return for Risk

MCHI vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MCHICQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.05
0.30

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.08
0.66

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.08

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

0.41

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

0.88

-0.96

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHI Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHI and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and CQQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MCHICQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.95%

-73.99%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.22%

-24.41%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.35%

-34.83%

+9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.41%

-62.09%

+10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.95%

-73.99%

+11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.24%

-52.02%

+15.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.67%

-28.49%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

11.28%

-0.02%

Volatility

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is 5.57%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 12.09%. This indicates that MCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MCHICQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

12.09%

-6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

24.80%

-10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

32.54%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.41%

38.19%

-7.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.35%

33.56%

-6.21%

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCHI vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than CQQQ's 2.24% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF		2.24%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF		1.96%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

MCHI and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CQQQ has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to MCHI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

On 10-year performance, CQQQ leads with 4.48% vs 4.22% for MCHI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCHI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a 4.48% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.96% for MCHI.

MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHI and CQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer