MCHI vs. FXI
MCHI (iShares MSCI China ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds from iShares - MCHI tracks the MSCI China Index while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MCHI returned 4.30%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for FXI. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MCHI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
MCHI vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -11.57% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 4.30%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.49% annualized return.
MCHI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -11.57%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- 1Y
- -0.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
FXI
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -12.38%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- -5.13%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- -3.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
MCHI vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -11.57% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 54.67% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -12.38% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHI and FXI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.96 |
The correlation between MCHI and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MCHI vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCHI
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
MCHI
FXI
Financial Services
MCHI
FXI
Communication Services
MCHI
FXI
Technology
MCHI
FXI
Basic Materials
MCHI
FXI
Industrials
MCHI
FXI
Healthcare
MCHI
FXI
Energy
MCHI
FXI
Consumer Defensive
MCHI
FXI
Utilities
MCHI
FXI
Real Estate
MCHI
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHI vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
MCHI
FXI
MCHI vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCHI | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.97 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.27 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | -0.65 | +0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCHI vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHI | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -72.68% | +9.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.74% | -18.77% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -28.72% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.98% | -54.94% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.95% | -60.81% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.70% | -31.00% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -31.21% | +6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.10% | 7.94% | +1.16% |
Volatility
MCHI vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) have volatilities of 5.95% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHI | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 5.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 14.59% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 19.97% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 31.70% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.39% | 27.66% | -0.27% |
MCHI vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHI vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than FXI's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.04% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MCHI and FXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MCHI has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to FXI (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 10-year performance, MCHI leads with 4.30% vs 2.49% for FXI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MCHI has performed better with a 4.30% return vs 2.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 2.04% for FXI.
MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.74% for FXI.
MCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCHI and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer