PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHI vs. FXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHI vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHI achieves a -11.57% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHI has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 4.30%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.49% annualized return.


MCHI

1D
-0.43%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
-11.57%
6M
-12.39%
1Y
-0.30%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
-6.15%
10Y*
4.30%

FXI

1D
-1.04%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
-12.38%
6M
-13.08%
1Y
-5.13%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
-3.84%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHI vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-11.57%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-21.74%27.78%23.72%-19.79%54.67%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-12.38%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHI and FXI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011

0.96

The correlation between MCHI and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

MCHI vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MCHI
FXI

Consumer Cyclical

24.9%
26.4%

Financial Services

18.8%
34.8%

Communication Services

18.1%
16.3%

Technology

12.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

5.5%
3.9%

Industrials

5.3%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.1%
2.3%

Energy

3.7%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.9%

Utilities

1.8%
0.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MCHI
24.9%
FXI
26.4%

Financial Services

MCHI
18.8%
FXI
34.8%

Communication Services

MCHI
18.1%
FXI
16.3%

Technology

MCHI
12.1%
FXI
5.4%

Basic Materials

MCHI
5.5%
FXI
3.9%

Industrials

MCHI
5.3%
FXI
3.2%

Healthcare

MCHI
5.1%
FXI
2.3%

Energy

MCHI
3.7%
FXI
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

MCHI
3.0%
FXI
0.9%

Utilities

MCHI
1.8%
FXI
0.4%

Real Estate

MCHI
1.6%
FXI
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHI vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHI vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCHIFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.97

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

-0.27

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-0.65

+0.61

MCHI vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHI Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is higher than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHI and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCHI vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHI drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHI and FXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHIFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.95%

-72.68%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.74%

-18.77%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-28.72%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

-54.94%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.95%

-60.81%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.70%

-31.00%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.56%

-31.21%

+6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

7.94%

+1.16%

Volatility

MCHI vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) have volatilities of 5.95% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHIFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

5.83%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

14.59%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

19.97%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.73%

31.70%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

27.66%

-0.27%

MCHI vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCHI vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than FXI's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.04%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.08%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MCHI and FXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MCHI has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to FXI (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHI dropped -62.95% vs FXI's -72.68%.

On 10-year performance, MCHI leads with 4.30% vs 2.49% for FXI. On fees, MCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MCHI has performed better with a 4.30% return vs 2.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 2.04% for FXI.

MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.74% for FXI.

MCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHI and FXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer