NORW vs. MGK
NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) and MGK (Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NORW is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while MGK is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NORW returned 9.95%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for MGK. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NORW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGK.
Performance
NORW vs. MGK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NORW achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, NORW has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 9.95%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.23% annualized return.
NORW
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 20.67%
- 1Y
- 23.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
MGK
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.23%
NORW vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 18.59% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 5.89% | 20.67% | 32.94% | 51.67% | -33.59% | 28.58% | 41.01% | 37.38% | -2.91% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NORW and MGK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2009 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NORW and MGK has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
NORW vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NORW
MGK
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
NORW
MGK
-
Financial Services
NORW
MGK
Industrials
NORW
MGK
Consumer Defensive
NORW
MGK
Basic Materials
NORW
MGK
Communication Services
NORW
MGK
Technology
NORW
MGK
Utilities
NORW
MGK
Real Estate
NORW
MGK
Consumer Cyclical
NORW
MGK
Healthcare
NORW
-
MGK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NORW vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank
NORW
MGK
NORW vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NORW | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.54 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 5.19 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NORW vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NORW drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NORW and MGK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NORW | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.62% | -48.43% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -16.85% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.06% | -23.36% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.78% | -36.01% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.86% | -36.01% | +2.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.43% | -5.13% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -7.58% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 5.00% | -1.67% |
Volatility
NORW vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) is 4.59%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that NORW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NORW | MGK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 6.78% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 13.63% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 17.22% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 22.78% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 21.97% | -1.20% |
NORW vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison
NORW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
NORW vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison
NORW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.70% | 0.41% | 0.65% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.43% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.90% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NORW and MGK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGK has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to NORW (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NORW dropped -35.62% vs MGK's -48.43%.
On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 19.23% vs 9.95% for NORW. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 19.23% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.
NORW is categorized as Europe Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for NORW and 0.05% for MGK.
MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NORW and MGK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer