PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHI vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHI vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MCHI

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
-7.22%
6M
-8.98%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
-5.76%
10Y*
4.49%

CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHI vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-7.22%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-21.74%27.78%23.72%-19.79%54.67%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHI and CN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014

0.80

The correlation between MCHI and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MCHI vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MCHI
CN

Consumer Cyclical

26.4%
5.4%

Financial Services

19.1%
55.1%

Communication Services

18.8%
0.4%

Technology

9.6%
0.3%

Basic Materials

5.5%
0.6%

Healthcare

5.4%
0.8%

Industrials

5.0%
1.0%

Energy

3.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
0.3%

Utilities

1.7%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MCHI
26.4%
CN
5.4%

Financial Services

MCHI
19.1%
CN
55.1%

Communication Services

MCHI
18.8%
CN
0.4%

Technology

MCHI
9.6%
CN
0.3%

Basic Materials

MCHI
5.5%
CN
0.6%

Healthcare

MCHI
5.4%
CN
0.8%

Industrials

MCHI
5.0%
CN
1.0%

Energy

MCHI
3.7%
CN
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

MCHI
3.2%
CN
0.3%

Utilities

MCHI
1.7%
CN
0.2%

Real Estate

MCHI
1.5%
CN
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHI vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHI vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCHICNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

MCHI vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCHICNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

Drawdowns

MCHI vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHICNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

Volatility

MCHI vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHICNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

MCHI vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCHI vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

MCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.28%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCHI and CN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCHI.

MCHI has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

MCHI tracks MSCI China Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCHI and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHI and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer