MCDWX vs. EXHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX).
MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020. EXHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995.
Performance
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | -0.13% | 7.57% | 4.13% | 7.31% | -11.13% | 0.01% | 8.77% |
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | -6.73% | 12.05% | 11.86% | 19.08% | -20.33% | 18.37% | 33.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCDWX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than EXHAX's -6.73% return.
MCDWX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
EXHAX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCDWX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXHAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCDWX vs. EXHAX — Risk / Return Rank
MCDWX
EXHAX
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCDWX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.45 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 0.76 | +1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 0.54 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 2.18 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCDWX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.45 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.30 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCDWX and EXHAX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Dividend Comparison
MCDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than EXHAX's 11.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 4.43% | 4.83% | 4.41% | 4.48% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXHAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series | 11.39% | 10.62% | 6.41% | 2.13% | 10.95% | 6.01% | 3.28% | 5.21% | 10.32% | 7.83% | 2.08% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCDWX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum EXHAX drawdown of -51.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDWX and EXHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCDWX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -51.96% | +36.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -13.33% | +11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | -27.63% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -10.52% | +8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -8.88% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 3.29% | -2.68% |
Volatility
MCDWX vs. EXHAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) is 1.42%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series (EXHAX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that MCDWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCDWX | EXHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 5.64% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 9.42% | -7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 16.01% | -12.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 14.42% | -9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 15.24% | -10.83% |