MCDWX vs. DSFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and DFA Social Fixed Income Portfolio (DSFIX).
MCDWX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020. DSFIX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 5, 2016.
Performance
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | -0.13% | 7.57% | 4.13% | 7.31% | -11.13% | 0.01% | 8.77% |
DSFIX DFA Social Fixed Income Portfolio | -0.12% | 6.80% | 1.81% | 7.18% | -13.07% | -2.19% | 5.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCDWX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than DSFIX's -0.12% return.
MCDWX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- —
DSFIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCDWX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DSFIX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MCDWX vs. DSFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCDWX
DSFIX
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and DFA Social Fixed Income Portfolio (DSFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCDWX | DSFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.96 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 1.38 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.79 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 5.39 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCDWX | DSFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.96 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.08 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCDWX and DSFIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Dividend Comparison
MCDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DSFIX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series | 4.43% | 4.83% | 4.41% | 4.48% | 3.25% | 4.45% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSFIX DFA Social Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.02% | 3.61% | 3.95% | 3.28% | 2.54% | 2.70% | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.56% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCDWX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum DSFIX drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDWX and DSFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCDWX | DSFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -18.94% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.20% | -2.66% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | -18.87% | +2.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -1.95% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -4.72% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.88% | -0.27% |
Volatility
MCDWX vs. DSFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) is 1.42%, while DFA Social Fixed Income Portfolio (DSFIX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that MCDWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCDWX | DSFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.59% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | 2.59% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 4.39% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.62% | 5.77% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 4.97% | -0.56% |