MBCE vs. ILCB
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MBCE tracks the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
MBCE vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.93%
MBCE vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -1.39% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and ILCB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
MBCE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILCB
MBCE vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBCE | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -7.04%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -51.53% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -3.31% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -6.23% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility
MBCE vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.69% | 12.64% | +35.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 17.22% | +30.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 18.19% | +29.50% |
MBCE vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
MBCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ILCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBCE and ILCB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for MBCE.
MBCE tracks Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Kingsview Partners LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.03% for ILCB.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer