MAXI vs. IWMI
MAXI (Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF) and IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAXI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Simplify, while IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAXI returned -57.63% vs 37.32% for IWMI. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAXI charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IWMI.
Performance
MAXI vs. IWMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAXI achieves a -35.86% return, which is significantly lower than IWMI's 16.41% return.
MAXI
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -19.20%
- YTD
- -35.86%
- 6M
- -37.09%
- 1Y
- -57.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWMI
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 37.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAXI vs. IWMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF | -35.86% | -28.59% | 42.40% |
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 16.41% | 14.97% | 6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAXI and IWMI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between MAXI and IWMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAXI vs. IWMI — Risk / Return Rank
MAXI
IWMI
MAXI vs. IWMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAXI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.42 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 4.43 | -5.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 18.24 | -19.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAXI vs. IWMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAXI drawdown since its inception was -68.91%, which is greater than IWMI's maximum drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXI and IWMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAXI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.91% | -23.88% | -45.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.91% | -8.40% | -60.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.49% | 0.00% | -67.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.30% | -4.04% | -15.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.94% | 2.03% | +42.91% |
Volatility
MAXI vs. IWMI - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) at 5.41%. This indicates that MAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAXI | IWMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.91% | 5.41% | +7.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 11.46% | +32.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.18% | 15.38% | +49.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.64% | 17.97% | +45.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.64% | 17.97% | +45.67% |
MAXI vs. IWMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAXI has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAXI vs. IWMI - Dividend Comparison
MAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.81%, more than IWMI's 14.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.51% | 14.05% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF | 68.81% | 49.00% | 32.06% | 29.63% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAXI and IWMI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAXI has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to IWMI (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXI dropped -68.91% vs IWMI's -23.88%.
On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 37.32% vs -57.63% for MAXI. On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IWMI has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 37.32% return vs -57.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MAXI.
MAXI has the higher dividend yield at 68.81%, compared with 14.51% for IWMI.
MAXI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IWMI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MAXI and 0.68% for IWMI.
IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAXI and IWMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer