PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXI vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAXI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXI achieves a -33.46% return, which is significantly lower than BTCI's -22.74% return.


MAXI

1D
-2.93%
1M
-20.54%
YTD
-33.46%
6M
-42.63%
1Y
-60.98%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCI

1D
-2.56%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
-22.74%
6M
-26.41%
1Y
-33.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAXI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAXI
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF
-33.46%-28.59%34.08%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-22.74%-1.09%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MAXI and BTCI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.94

The correlation between MAXI and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAXI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXI
MAXI Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAXIBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.87

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.75

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-1.34

-0.09

MAXI vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXI Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is comparable to the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXI and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAXIBTCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

-0.86

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.03

+0.34

Drawdowns

MAXI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXI drawdown since its inception was -66.78%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXI and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXIBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.78%

-44.98%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.78%

-44.98%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.27%

-42.87%

-23.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-15.18%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.76%

25.05%

+17.71%

Volatility

MAXI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 8.35%. This indicates that MAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAXIBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.92%

8.35%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.84%

30.94%

+14.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.83%

38.93%

+26.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.81%

40.11%

+23.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.81%

40.11%

+23.70%

MAXI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXI has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAXI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

MAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.33%, more than BTCI's 43.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
43.16%36.46%6.76%0.00%0.00%
MAXI
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF
66.33%49.00%32.06%29.63%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MAXI and BTCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAXI has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to BTCI (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXI dropped -66.78% vs BTCI's -44.98%.

On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -33.43% vs -60.98% for MAXI. On fees, MAXI is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -33.43% return vs -60.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXI is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

MAXI has the higher dividend yield at 66.33%, compared with 43.16% for BTCI.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MAXI and 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAXI and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer