MATE vs. GDT
MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
MATE vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MATE
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MATE vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 6.15% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -16.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MATE and GDT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MATE vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MATE vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MATE drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATE and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MATE | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -24.66% | +11.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -24.66% | +17.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -11.15% | +7.78% |
Volatility
MATE vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MATE | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 33.09% | -9.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 33.09% | -9.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 33.09% | -9.83% |
MATE vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MATE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MATE vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.97% |
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MATE and GDT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MATE and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for MATE and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer