MAR vs. AMZN
MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MAR in Lodging, AMZN in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, MAR returned 21.03%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAR vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 3.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MAR having a 21.03% annualized return and AMZN not far behind at 20.83%.
MAR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 15.18%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 54.28%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.91%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
MAR vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 30.26% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.24% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAR and AMZN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997 | 0.34 |
The correlation between MAR and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAR:
$12.66
AMZN:
$8.37
MAR:
31.80
AMZN:
28.50
MAR:
0.83
AMZN:
0.69
MAR:
3.78
AMZN:
3.48
MAR:
$21.73B
AMZN:
$742.78B
MAR:
$1.31B
AMZN:
$348.59B
MAR:
$3.81B
AMZN:
$152.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAR vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
MAR
AMZN
MAR vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAR | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 0.55 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | 1.29 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAR vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAR | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.59% | -94.40% | +18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -21.74% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.50% | -30.88% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -56.15% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -56.15% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.25% | +13.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -28.19% | +13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 9.21% | -4.20% |
Volatility
MAR vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) is 6.92%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that MAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAR | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 7.92% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 20.73% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.32% | 30.13% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 35.53% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 32.48% | +0.42% |
Dividends
MAR vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
Financials
MAR vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAR and AMZN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAR and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer