PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than META's -12.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed META with an annualized return of 21.21%, while META has yielded a comparatively lower 17.78% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
2.90%
1M
-5.76%
YTD
5.88%
6M
7.77%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
24.88%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
21.21%

META

1D
1.70%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-12.40%
6M
-12.97%
1Y
-16.77%
3Y*
27.49%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
17.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
5.88%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-12.40%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and META is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.57

The correlation between AMZN and META has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.66T

META:

$1.48T

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

AMZN:

29.20

META:

21.02

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.71

META:

0.87

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.57

META:

6.90

PB Ratio

AMZN:

6.01

META:

6.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.94

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.51

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

-1.03

+2.64

AMZN vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-76.74%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-33.30%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-34.15%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-76.74%

+20.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-76.74%

+20.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.13%

-26.69%

+15.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-15.84%

-12.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.32%

16.38%

-7.06%

Volatility

AMZN vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 9.64%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 12.77%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.64%

12.77%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.29%

27.88%

-6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.56%

36.16%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.61%

44.16%

-8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.53%

38.74%

-6.21%

Dividends

AMZN vs. META - Dividend Comparison

AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%

Financials

AMZN vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
56.31B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
81.9%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and META have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (12.77%) compared to AMZN (9.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs META's -76.74%.

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer