MAPP vs. NTSI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) and NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAPP returned 20.98% vs 20.27% for NTSI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAPP charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NTSI.

Performance

MAPP vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than NTSI's 6.38% return.

MAPP

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 7.14%
• 6M: 6.86%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSI

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 20.27%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 5.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAPP vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	7.14%	18.67%	14.25%	4.01%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	6.38%	30.37%	1.11%	8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPP and NTSI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.84

The correlation between MAPP and NTSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAPP vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 70
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

NTSI

NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 37
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 37
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPP vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAPP	NTSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.31	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.86	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	1.65	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	5.95	+7.02

MAPP vs. NTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the NTSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPP and NTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAPP vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and NTSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAPP	NTSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-34.01%	+21.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.17%	-12.33%	+6.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-3.10%	+2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-9.11%	+7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	3.42%	-1.80%

Volatility

MAPP vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) is 4.29%, while WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that MAPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAPP	NTSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	5.19%	-0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	13.28%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.74%	15.51%	-5.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.92%	15.80%	-4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.92%	15.69%	-4.77%

MAPP vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAPP vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison

MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than NTSI's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.76%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund	3.53%	3.65%	2.92%	2.35%	2.66%	0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAPP and NTSI in my portfolio?

MAPP and NTSI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAPP or NTSI?

NTSI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to MAPP (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPP dropped -12.92% vs NTSI's -34.01%.

Which ETF is better, MAPP or NTSI?

On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 20.98% vs 20.27% for NTSI. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, MAPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAPP or NTSI?

Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 20.98% return vs 20.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAPP or NTSI?

NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAPP or NTSI?

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.76% for MAPP.

What is the main difference between MAPP and NTSI?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for MAPP and 0.26% for NTSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.