PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAPP vs. DYTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAPP vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than DYTA's 8.77% return.


MAPP

1D
0.34%
1M
3.08%
YTD
7.96%
6M
9.24%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DYTA

1D
0.69%
1M
5.13%
YTD
8.77%
6M
9.55%
1Y
16.37%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAPP vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
7.96%18.67%14.25%3.86%
DYTA
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
8.77%6.95%13.59%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPP and DYTA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.83

The correlation between MAPP and DYTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAPP vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPP
MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DYTA
DYTA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DYTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DYTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DYTA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DYTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DYTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPP vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAPPDYTADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

1.69

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.40

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.78

+1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.56

9.24

+5.33

MAPP vs. DYTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the DYTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPP and DYTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAPPDYTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.69

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

1.12

+0.44

Drawdowns

MAPP vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than DYTA's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and DYTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPPDYTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-9.41%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-9.33%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-2.21%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.80%

-0.25%

Volatility

MAPP vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPPDYTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.91%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

9.37%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

9.72%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

10.85%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.75%

10.85%

-0.10%

MAPP vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAPP vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison

MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than DYTA's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DYTA
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
1.51%1.64%10.80%0.89%
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
2.74%2.96%2.41%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAPP and DYTA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAPP has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DYTA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPP dropped -12.92% vs DYTA's -9.41%.

On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 22.00% vs 16.37% for DYTA. On fees, MAPP is cheaper at 0.92% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 22.00% return vs 16.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAPP is cheaper with a 0.92% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.

MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for MAPP and 1.04% for DYTA.

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAPP and DYTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer