MAPP vs. DYTA
MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) and DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAPP returned 22.00% vs 16.37% for DYTA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAPP charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DYTA.
Performance
MAPP vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than DYTA's 8.77% return.
MAPP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYTA
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAPP vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 7.96% | 18.67% | 14.25% | 3.86% |
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 8.77% | 6.95% | 13.59% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAPP and DYTA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MAPP and DYTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAPP vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank
MAPP
DYTA
MAPP vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAPP | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 1.69 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 2.40 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 1.78 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 9.24 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAPP | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 1.69 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 1.12 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
MAPP vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than DYTA's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and DYTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAPP | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -9.41% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.17% | -9.33% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -2.21% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.80% | -0.25% |
Volatility
MAPP vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAPP | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.91% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 9.37% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.92% | 9.72% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 10.85% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 10.85% | -0.10% |
MAPP vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAPP vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison
MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than DYTA's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 1.51% | 1.64% | 10.80% | 0.89% |
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | 2.74% | 2.96% | 2.41% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAPP and DYTA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAPP has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to DYTA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPP dropped -12.92% vs DYTA's -9.41%.
On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 22.00% vs 16.37% for DYTA. On fees, MAPP is cheaper at 0.92% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 22.00% return vs 16.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAPP is cheaper with a 0.92% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.
MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.51% for DYTA.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for MAPP and 1.04% for DYTA.
MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAPP and DYTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer