MAGC vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both China Equities funds. MAGC is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -21.81% vs -15.17% for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

MAGC vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -18.51% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -20.32% return.

MAGC

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 6M: -20.29%
• 1Y: -21.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: -20.32%
• 6M: -22.46%
• 1Y: -15.17%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: -14.33%
• 10Y*: -0.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-18.51%	16.35%	-14.54%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-20.32%	23.55%	-18.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and KWEB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.92

The correlation between MAGC and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 3
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGC	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.82	-0.56	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.12	-0.67	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.92	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	-0.45	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-0.90	-0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGC vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGC	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.82	-0.56	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.06	-0.41

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -32.86%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.86%	-80.92%	+48.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	-34.13%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-72.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.52%	-68.62%	+37.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.20%	-35.25%	+20.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.21%	16.97%	+0.24%

Volatility

MAGC vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) have volatilities of 11.12% and 11.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.12%	11.53%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	20.09%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.78%	27.25%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.38%	47.67%	-13.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.38%	39.98%	-5.60%

MAGC vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than KWEB's 7.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.73%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	5.03%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and KWEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MAGC and KWEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MAGC or KWEB?

KWEB has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to MAGC (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -32.86% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or KWEB?

On 1-year performance, KWEB leads with -15.17% vs -21.81% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MAGC has been the lower-risk option at 11.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGC or KWEB?

Over the 1-year period, KWEB has performed better with a -15.17% return vs -21.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or KWEB?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 5.03% for MAGC.

What is the main difference between MAGC and KWEB?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KWEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.