KWEB vs. CWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB).
KWEB and CWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. CWEB is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 2, 2016. Both KWEB and CWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KWEB or CWEB.
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and CWEB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KWEB vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KWEB:
0.58
CWEB:
0.25
KWEB:
1.13
CWEB:
0.99
KWEB:
1.14
CWEB:
1.12
KWEB:
0.34
CWEB:
0.22
KWEB:
1.59
CWEB:
0.68
KWEB:
15.63%
CWEB:
31.35%
KWEB:
42.55%
CWEB:
84.51%
KWEB:
-80.92%
CWEB:
-98.09%
KWEB:
-65.04%
CWEB:
-96.50%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than CWEB's 10.87% return.
KWEB
9.68%
-8.81%
4.31%
18.64%
-5.34%
-0.52%
CWEB
10.87%
-19.49%
-4.09%
9.68%
-31.57%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KWEB vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KWEB vs. CWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
KWEB
CWEB
KWEB vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KWEB vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than CWEB's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 3.20% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 3.75% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and CWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KWEB vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is 16.01%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 32.65%. This indicates that KWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.