KWEB vs. CQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both China Equities funds - KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index while CQQQ tracks the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KWEB returned 0.31%/yr vs 4.48%/yr for CQQQ. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.

Performance

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -16.33% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 0.31%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 4.48% annualized return.

KWEB

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 14.01%
• 6M: -19.47%
• YTD: -16.33%
• 1Y: -12.39%
• 3Y*: 0.77%
• 5Y*: -7.53%
• 10Y*: 0.31%
• ALL TIME*: 2.65%

CQQQ

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -6.83%
• 6M: -9.86%
• YTD: -3.27%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 6.42%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: 4.48%
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	$60.75M	$69.64M	$78.22M
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	$554.38M	$548.17M	$693.22M

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-16.33%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	69.73%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-3.27%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and CQQQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013	0.89

The correlation between KWEB and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KWEB	CQQQ
Consumer Cyclical	36.4%	16.5%
Communication Services	32.4%	24.7%
Technology	11.8%	57.0%
Healthcare	6.0%	-
Industrials	4.5%	1.2%
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	-
Financial Services	1.8%	0.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KWEB vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KWEB	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	0.30	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.62	0.66	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.08	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	0.41	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	0.88	-1.55

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KWEB and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than CQQQ's maximum drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KWEB	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.92%	-73.99%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.62%	-24.41%	-17.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.62%	-34.42%	-7.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.96%	-62.09%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.92%	-73.99%	-6.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.05%	-52.02%	-15.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.65%	-28.49%	-7.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.98%	11.28%	+10.70%

Volatility

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is 7.76%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 12.09%. This indicates that KWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KWEB	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	12.09%	-4.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.68%	24.80%	-4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.82%	32.54%	-4.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.99%	38.19%	+8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.04%	33.56%	+6.48%

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KWEB and CQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.70%.

Dividends

KWEB vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than CQQQ's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.24%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.36%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KWEB and CQQQ in my portfolio?

KWEB and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KWEB or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to KWEB (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which ETF is better, KWEB or CQQQ?

On 10-year performance, CQQQ leads with 4.48% vs 0.31% for KWEB. Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KWEB or CQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a 4.48% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KWEB or CQQQ?

KWEB and CQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KWEB or CQQQ?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.24% for CQQQ.

What is the main difference between KWEB and CQQQ?

KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.