MAGC vs. ISCMF
MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGC is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. MAGC is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -29.25% vs 31.30% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -28.24% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
MAGC
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -12.97%
- YTD
- -28.24%
- 6M
- -28.22%
- 1Y
- -29.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -28.24% | 16.35% | -14.03% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | -1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGC and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGC vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
MAGC
ISCMF
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGC | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 2.31 | -1.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 5.53 | -6.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 11.85 | -13.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGC | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -25.42% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.70% | -5.69% | -34.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.70% | -5.26% | -34.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -13.35% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.83% | 2.65% | +16.18% |
Volatility
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that MAGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGC | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 5.11% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.15% | 15.45% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.82% | 17.84% | +8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.10% | 14.29% | +19.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.10% | 14.29% | +19.81% |
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGC vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 5.72% | 4.10% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGC and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGC has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -39.70% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs -29.25% for MAGC. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs -29.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MAGC.
MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
MAGC is categorized as China Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.19% for ISCMF.
ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGC and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer