ISCMF vs. BWET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET).

ISCMF and BWET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISCMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2022. BWET is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. It was launched on May 3, 2023. Both ISCMF and BWET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ISCMF vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ISCMF vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	17.84%	19.65%	3.13%	-0.08%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	411.30%	96.22%	-39.21%	15.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 411.30% return.

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 17.84%
• 6M: 26.76%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: -19.47%
• 1M: 71.90%
• YTD: 411.30%
• 6M: 568.02%
• 1Y: 802.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCMF vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

BWET

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF

ISCMF

iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ISCMF vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 94
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCMF vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISCMF	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	9.77	-7.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	5.78	-2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.36	1.86	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	27.62	-22.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.38	78.05	-65.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISCMF vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCMF Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 9.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCMF and BWET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISCMF	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	9.77	-7.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.50	-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between ISCMF and BWET is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ISCMF vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISCMF nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ISCMF vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCMF	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-56.90%	+31.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.69%	-28.84%	+23.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.55%	-19.47%	+16.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.98%	-24.74%	+10.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	10.21%	-7.80%

Volatility

ISCMF vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) is 9.72%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 51.89%. This indicates that ISCMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCMF	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.72%	51.89%	-42.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	72.97%	-59.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	83.00%	-66.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	64.49%	-50.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.05%	64.49%	-50.44%