ISCMF vs. HGER
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER).
ISCMF and HGER are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISCMF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2022. HGER is a passively managed fund by Harbor that tracks the performance of the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 9, 2022. Both ISCMF and HGER are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ISCMF vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISCMF vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 17.84% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.08% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 24.94% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | -1.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCMF achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 24.94% return.
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 26.76%
- 1Y
- 29.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HGER
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 24.94%
- 6M
- 28.72%
- 1Y
- 38.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISCMF vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCMF has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISCMF vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
ISCMF
HGER
ISCMF vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCMF | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.12 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 2.79 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.36 | 1.39 | +0.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 4.51 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.38 | 15.96 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCMF | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.12 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.89 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCMF and HGER is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ISCMF vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HGER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.67% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% |
Drawdowns
ISCMF vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCMF drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCMF and HGER.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCMF | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -23.31% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.69% | -8.84% | +3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -0.61% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.98% | -7.91% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.50% | -0.09% |
Volatility
ISCMF vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 7.42%. This indicates that ISCMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISCMF | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 7.42% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 14.60% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 18.10% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 17.79% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 17.79% | -3.74% |