MAGC vs. ASHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. MAGC is actively managed, while ASHX is passively managed. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASHX.

Performance

MAGC vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGC

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -12.97%
• YTD: -28.24%
• 6M: -28.22%
• 1Y: -29.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-28.24%	16.35%	-14.03%
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 1
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ASHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGC	ASHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	ASHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.70%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.72%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	ASHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.82%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.10%	—	—

MAGC vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	5.72%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MAGC or ASHX?

On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or ASHX?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or ASHX?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

What is the main difference between MAGC and ASHX?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.60% for ASHX.