MAGC vs. AFTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) are both China Equities funds. MAGC is actively managed, while AFTY is passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AFTY.

Performance

MAGC vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGC

• 1D: 4.10%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: -15.36%
• 6M: -17.67%
• 1Y: -15.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-15.36%	16.35%	-14.54%
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and AFTY is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 4
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGC	AFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGC	AFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.29	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	AFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.88%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	AFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.65%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.36%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.36%	—	—

MAGC vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	4.85%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and AFTY in my portfolio?

MAGC and AFTY have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or AFTY?

On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or AFTY?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or AFTY?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

What is the main difference between MAGC and AFTY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.70% for AFTY.