MAGA vs. BUFH
MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, MAGA returned 13.03% vs 6.20% for BUFH. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
MAGA vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.
MAGA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGA vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 8.12% | 4.54% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.30% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and BUFH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
BUFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGA vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -1.53% | -41.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -1.53% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.26% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -0.18% | -5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGA vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.32% | 2.38% | +8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 2.38% | +13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 2.38% | +17.88% |
MAGA vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.49% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and BUFH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, MAGA leads with 13.03% vs 6.20% for BUFH. On fees, MAGA is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGA is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer