PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGA vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAGA having a 7.40% return and VOOV slightly higher at 7.53%.


MAGA

1D
0.30%
1M
1.30%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.60%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*

VOOV

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
7.53%
6M
6.93%
1Y
20.11%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
7.40%10.31%14.69%10.37%-1.01%33.60%5.93%26.08%-14.82%11.50%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.53%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%9.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and VOOV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.91

The correlation between MAGA and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGA vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGA
VOOV

Industrials

22.4%
11.0%

Financial Services

14.8%
15.0%

Energy

11.4%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
11.1%

Utilities

10.4%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
9.5%

Basic Materials

7.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

7.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

6.0%
11.6%

Technology

2.5%
19.0%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Industrials

MAGA
22.4%
VOOV
11.0%

Financial Services

MAGA
14.8%
VOOV
15.0%

Energy

MAGA
11.4%
VOOV
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGA
10.4%
VOOV
11.1%

Utilities

MAGA
10.4%
VOOV
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

MAGA
7.5%
VOOV
9.5%

Basic Materials

MAGA
7.3%
VOOV
3.5%

Real Estate

MAGA
7.2%
VOOV
3.4%

Healthcare

MAGA
6.0%
VOOV
11.6%

Technology

MAGA
2.5%
VOOV
19.0%

Communication Services

MAGA

-

VOOV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGA vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGAVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.22

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

12.21

-6.58

MAGA vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGAVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-37.31%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-6.27%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-17.55%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-18.10%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.25%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-3.83%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.65%

+0.66%

Volatility

MAGA vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) have volatilities of 3.02% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGAVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

2.97%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

7.36%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

9.97%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

14.44%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

16.92%

+3.34%

MAGA vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGA vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.50%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%0.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGA and VOOV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGA has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to VOOV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 11.18% vs 10.18% for MAGA. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 11.18% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.50% for MAGA.

MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGA and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer