PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGA vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than VOOV's 7.94% return.


MAGA

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
5.78%
6M
5.93%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*

VOOV

1D
0.52%
1M
2.02%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.72%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
5.78%10.31%14.69%10.37%-1.01%33.60%5.93%26.08%-14.82%12.12%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.94%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and VOOV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.91

The correlation between MAGA and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGA vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGA
VOOV

Industrials

22.4%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
11.1%

Energy

14.0%
7.6%

Basic Materials

10.4%
3.5%

Utilities

9.8%
4.6%

Financial Services

8.5%
15.0%

Healthcare

6.8%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.5%

Technology

3.0%
19.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
3.4%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Industrials

MAGA
22.4%
VOOV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGA
16.5%
VOOV
11.1%

Energy

MAGA
14.0%
VOOV
7.6%

Basic Materials

MAGA
10.4%
VOOV
3.5%

Utilities

MAGA
9.8%
VOOV
4.6%

Financial Services

MAGA
8.5%
VOOV
15.0%

Healthcare

MAGA
6.8%
VOOV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

MAGA
4.9%
VOOV
9.5%

Technology

MAGA
3.0%
VOOV
19.0%

Real Estate

MAGA
2.8%
VOOV
3.4%

Communication Services

MAGA

-

VOOV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGA vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGAVOOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

2.29

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

3.18

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.63

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

13.90

-7.92

MAGA vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGAVOOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.29

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.75

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.75

-0.21

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGAVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-37.31%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-6.27%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-17.55%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-18.10%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-0.13%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-3.84%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.64%

+0.61%

Volatility

MAGA vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.07%. This indicates that MAGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGAVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.07%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

7.07%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

9.82%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

14.45%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

16.95%

+3.36%

MAGA vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGA vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.52%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%0.00%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGA and VOOV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGA has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to VOOV (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 10.81% vs 9.25% for MAGA. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.52% for MAGA.

MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.10% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGA and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer