MAGA vs. NANC
Compare and contrast key facts about Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC).
MAGA and NANC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGA is a passively managed fund by Point Bridge Capital that tracks the performance of the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2017. NANC is an actively managed fund by Subversive. It was launched on Feb 7, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAGA or NANC.
Key characteristics
| MAGA | NANC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.33% | 30.05% |
| 1Y Return | 37.85% | 44.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.03 | 2.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.44 | 3.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.28 | 3.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.39 | 16.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.18% | 2.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.51% | 15.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.17% | -11.06% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and NANC is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MAGA vs. NANC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 22.33% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 30.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGA vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NANC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAGA vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAGA vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than NANC's 0.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.31% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
NANC Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF | 0.72% | 0.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and NANC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAGA vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) at 4.42%. This indicates that MAGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.