PortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. NANC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and NANC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MAGA vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
21.98%
48.02%
MAGA
NANC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAGA:

0.81

NANC:

0.71

Sortino Ratio

MAGA:

1.24

NANC:

1.03

Omega Ratio

MAGA:

1.15

NANC:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MAGA:

1.06

NANC:

1.04

Martin Ratio

MAGA:

2.78

NANC:

3.73

Ulcer Index

MAGA:

3.68%

NANC:

3.07%

Daily Std Dev

MAGA:

12.68%

NANC:

16.21%

Max Drawdown

MAGA:

-43.17%

NANC:

-11.06%

Current Drawdown

MAGA:

-7.40%

NANC:

-8.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than NANC's -3.37% return.


MAGA

YTD

1.52%

1M

-2.53%

6M

3.75%

1Y

10.14%

5Y*

16.20%

10Y*

N/A

NANC

YTD

-3.37%

1M

-6.92%

6M

5.67%

1Y

12.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAGA vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than NANC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for NANC: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for MAGA: current value at 0.72% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.72%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAGA vs. NANC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAGA is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAGA is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAGA is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAGA is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAGA is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAGA is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NANC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NANC is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NANC is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NANC is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NANC is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NANC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NANC is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAGA vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAGA, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.810.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAGA, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.241.03
The chart of Omega ratio for MAGA, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.151.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAGA, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.061.04
The chart of Martin ratio for MAGA, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.783.73
MAGA
NANC

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and NANC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
0.81
0.71
MAGA
NANC

Dividends

MAGA vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than NANC's 0.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.17%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%
NANC
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF
0.21%0.20%0.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and NANC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
-7.40%
-8.92%
MAGA
NANC

Volatility

MAGA vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 4.14%, while Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%OctoberNovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarch
4.14%
5.58%
MAGA
NANC