MAGA vs. NANC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MAGA is passively managed, while NANC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGA returned 15.10%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for NANC. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.72% expense ratio.

Performance

MAGA vs. NANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than NANC's 9.48% return.

MAGA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 5.76%
• 6M: 4.95%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 15.10%
• 5Y*: 9.20%
• 10Y*: —

NANC

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.13%
• 1Y: 26.05%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. NANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF	5.76%	10.31%	14.69%	4.77%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	9.48%	18.54%	26.83%	20.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and NANC is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.61

The correlation between MAGA and NANC shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MAGA vs. NANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGA	NANC
Industrials	22.4%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	16.5%	9.2%
Energy	14.0%	-
Basic Materials	10.4%	2.2%
Utilities	9.8%	0.6%
Financial Services	8.5%	7.7%
Healthcare	6.8%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.6%
Technology	3.0%	41.5%
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Communication Services	-	15.1%

Return for Risk

MAGA vs. NANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA

MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 32
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 35

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 51
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. NANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGA	NANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.93	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.67	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.34	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	2.14	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	8.86	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGA vs. NANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the NANC Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and NANC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGA	NANC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.93	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.38	-0.84

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. NANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than NANC's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and NANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGA	NANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.17%	-20.94%	-22.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.02%	-12.21%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-20.94%	+3.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-1.34%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-2.67%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	2.95%	-0.69%

Volatility

MAGA vs. NANC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 2.64%, while Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGA	NANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	3.65%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	10.38%	-2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	13.60%	-2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.31%	16.73%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.30%	16.73%	+3.57%

MAGA vs. NANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAGA and NANC have an expense ratio of 0.72%.

Dividends

MAGA vs. NANC - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than NANC's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF	1.52%	1.61%	1.18%	1.60%	1.33%	0.69%	2.59%	2.19%	2.14%	0.43%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGA and NANC in my portfolio?

MAGA and NANC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGA or NANC?

NANC has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to MAGA (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs NANC's -20.94%.

Which ETF is better, MAGA or NANC?

On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 23.55% vs 15.10% for MAGA. Both ETFs have the same 0.72% expense ratio. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGA or NANC?

Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGA or NANC?

MAGA and NANC have the same expense ratio: 0.72% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGA or NANC?

MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

What is the main difference between MAGA and NANC?

They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Subversive.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.