MAGA vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
MAGA and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGA is a passively managed fund by Point Bridge Capital that tracks the performance of the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both MAGA and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAGA or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and SCHG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MAGA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MAGA:
1.23
SCHG:
2.05
MAGA:
1.81
SCHG:
2.68
MAGA:
1.22
SCHG:
1.37
MAGA:
1.67
SCHG:
2.91
MAGA:
6.33
SCHG:
11.49
MAGA:
2.41%
SCHG:
3.13%
MAGA:
12.34%
SCHG:
17.49%
MAGA:
-43.17%
SCHG:
-34.59%
MAGA:
-9.13%
SCHG:
-3.88%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 35.44% return.
MAGA
14.26%
-6.45%
7.68%
14.38%
12.17%
N/A
SCHG
35.44%
3.33%
10.58%
35.25%
19.99%
16.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAGA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAGA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than SCHG's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.40% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAGA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 3.97%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.