MAGA vs. IVV
MAGA (Truth Social America First ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Truth Social America First Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
MAGA vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MAGA
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.33B | $3.25B | $5.92B | |
| $74.91K | $74.91K | $74.91K |
MAGA vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MAGA Truth Social America First ETF | -0.06% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and IVV is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2026 | 0.14 |
MAGA vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGA
IVV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MAGA
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
MAGA
IVV
Energy
MAGA
IVV
Basic Materials
MAGA
IVV
Utilities
MAGA
IVV
Financial Services
MAGA
IVV
Healthcare
MAGA
IVV
Consumer Defensive
MAGA
IVV
Technology
MAGA
IVV
Real Estate
MAGA
IVV
Communication Services
MAGA
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVV
MAGA vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social America First ETF (MAGA) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGA | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -55.25% | +53.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -10.72% | +9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility
MAGA vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 12.87% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 17.03% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 18.07% | -6.64% |
MAGA vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
MAGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
MAGA Truth Social America First ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and IVV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for MAGA.
MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. MAGA tracks Truth Social America First Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.03% for IVV.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer