MAGA vs. BBUS
MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MAGA tracks the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MAGA returned 10.22%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for BBUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
MAGA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.68% return.
MAGA
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 8.12% | 10.31% | 14.69% | 10.37% | -1.01% | 33.60% | 5.93% | 11.36% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.68% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and BBUS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MAGA and BBUS has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MAGA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGA
BBUS
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MAGA
BBUS
Financial Services
MAGA
BBUS
Energy
MAGA
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
MAGA
BBUS
Utilities
MAGA
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
MAGA
BBUS
Basic Materials
MAGA
BBUS
Real Estate
MAGA
BBUS
Healthcare
MAGA
BBUS
Technology
MAGA
BBUS
Communication Services
MAGA
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
BBUS
MAGA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.35 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 10.33 | -4.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -35.35% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -9.21% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | -19.01% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -25.46% | +7.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -3.37% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -5.43% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.09% | +0.22% |
Volatility
MAGA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 3.05%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 4.89% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 9.87% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.32% | 12.53% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 17.13% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 19.59% | +0.67% |
MAGA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than BBUS's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.49% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBUS has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to MAGA (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.46% vs 10.22% for MAGA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.
MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.03% for BBUS.
MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer