PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.68% return.


MAGA

1D
0.67%
1M
1.99%
YTD
8.12%
6M
6.96%
1Y
13.03%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
7.68%
6M
6.38%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
8.12%10.31%14.69%10.37%-1.01%33.60%5.93%11.36%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.68%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and BBUS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between MAGA and BBUS has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MAGA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGA
BBUS

Industrials

22.4%
7.4%

Financial Services

14.8%
11.2%

Energy

11.4%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.1%

Utilities

10.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

7.2%
1.7%

Healthcare

6.0%
8.0%

Technology

2.5%
38.1%

Communication Services

-

10.0%

Industrials

MAGA
22.4%
BBUS
7.4%

Financial Services

MAGA
14.8%
BBUS
11.2%

Energy

MAGA
11.4%
BBUS
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGA
10.4%
BBUS
9.1%

Utilities

MAGA
10.4%
BBUS
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

MAGA
7.5%
BBUS
4.4%

Basic Materials

MAGA
7.3%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

MAGA
7.2%
BBUS
1.7%

Healthcare

MAGA
6.0%
BBUS
8.0%

Technology

MAGA
2.5%
BBUS
38.1%

Communication Services

MAGA

-

BBUS
10.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.35

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

10.33

-4.68

MAGA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-35.35%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-9.21%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-19.01%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-25.46%

+7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-3.37%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-5.43%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.09%

+0.22%

Volatility

MAGA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 3.05%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

4.89%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

9.87%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

12.53%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

17.13%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

19.59%

+0.67%

MAGA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than BBUS's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.49%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to MAGA (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.46% vs 10.22% for MAGA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.

MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.03% for BBUS.

MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer