LZIEX vs. GLFOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) and GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) are both mutual funds - LZIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard, while GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX returned 8.00%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for GLFOX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZIEX charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for GLFOX.

Performance

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZIEX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than GLFOX's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX has underperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.

LZIEX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.27%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 12.06%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 8.72%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

GLFOX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 13.64%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	9.81%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.26%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LZIEX and GLFOX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between LZIEX and GLFOX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LZIEX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 29
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LZIEX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.43	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.94	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.70	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	5.74	+0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZIEX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LZIEX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.43	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	1.01	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.75	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.82	-0.44

Drawdowns

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than GLFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZIEX and GLFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZIEX	GLFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-29.65%	-25.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.88%	-9.01%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-10.07%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.42%	-17.14%	-13.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-29.65%	-5.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-5.85%	+4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-3.42%	-7.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.67%	+0.74%

Volatility

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZIEX	GLFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	4.51%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.25%	9.32%	+1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	10.74%	+3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	11.00%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	13.34%	+2.79%

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZIEX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZIEX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

LZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than GLFOX's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	6.10%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.25%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZIEX and GLFOX in my portfolio?

LZIEX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZIEX or GLFOX?

LZIEX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to GLFOX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZIEX dropped -55.35% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.