PortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and MRFOX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GLFOX:

1.96

MRFOX:

1.03

Sortino Ratio

GLFOX:

2.32

MRFOX:

1.36

Omega Ratio

GLFOX:

1.32

MRFOX:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

GLFOX:

2.84

MRFOX:

1.31

Martin Ratio

GLFOX:

8.81

MRFOX:

5.12

Ulcer Index

GLFOX:

2.15%

MRFOX:

2.03%

Daily Std Dev

GLFOX:

11.12%

MRFOX:

11.57%

Max Drawdown

GLFOX:

-29.65%

MRFOX:

-29.10%

Current Drawdown

GLFOX:

-0.78%

MRFOX:

-2.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's 3.44% return.


GLFOX

YTD

13.65%

1M

3.02%

6M

10.89%

1Y

21.30%

3Y*

8.25%

5Y*

10.09%

10Y*

8.73%

MRFOX

YTD

3.44%

1M

1.27%

6M

-0.47%

1Y

11.79%

3Y*

16.24%

5Y*

15.47%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GLFOX vs. MRFOX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLFOX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLFOX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLFOX is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLFOX is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLFOX is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLFOX is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MRFOX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MRFOX is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MRFOX is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MRFOX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MRFOX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MRFOX is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and MRFOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than MRFOX's 4.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
3.03%4.00%2.68%14.50%5.97%2.39%4.20%13.98%6.82%3.18%11.00%12.39%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
4.43%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.70%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, roughly equal to the maximum MRFOX drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and MRFOX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GLFOX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) is 2.69%, while Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that GLFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...