PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZIEX vs. CAIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZIEX achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly higher than CAIBX's 10.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LZIEX having a 8.30% annualized return and CAIBX not far behind at 7.92%.


LZIEX

1D
2.26%
1M
0.97%
6M
4.88%
YTD
11.20%
1Y
23.47%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
8.30%
ALL TIME*
6.58%

CAIBX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.60%
6M
6.96%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
7.92%
ALL TIME*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZIEX
Lazard International Equity Portfolio
11.20%34.14%5.30%16.49%-15.00%6.14%8.76%21.20%-13.71%22.82%
CAIBX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A
10.38%20.39%10.24%8.95%-7.14%14.99%3.20%17.23%-7.28%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LZIEX and CAIBX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 1991

0.76

The correlation between LZIEX and CAIBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.86 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZIEX vs. CAIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LZIEX
LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIBX
CAIBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CAIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LZIEXCAIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.74

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

10.94

-4.51

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the CAIBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZIEX and CAIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than CAIBX's maximum drawdown of -43.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZIEX and CAIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZIEXCAIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-43.68%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-6.47%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.71%

-8.89%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.42%

-17.65%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-25.28%

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-3.79%

-7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.62%

+1.83%

Volatility

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) at 1.97%. This indicates that LZIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZIEXCAIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

1.97%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

6.56%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

8.20%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

9.98%

+5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

10.77%

+5.13%

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZIEX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than CAIBX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZIEX vs. CAIBX - Dividend Comparison

LZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.11%, more than CAIBX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAIBX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A
7.11%7.71%5.76%3.47%3.43%3.14%3.38%4.10%3.55%4.44%3.52%3.62%
LZIEX
Lazard International Equity Portfolio
11.11%12.35%8.26%3.78%6.12%17.81%1.03%2.07%7.93%1.42%1.06%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZIEX and CAIBX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZIEX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to CAIBX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZIEX dropped -55.35% vs CAIBX's -43.68%.

CAIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZIEX and CAIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer