LZIEX vs. HLMIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) and HLMIX (Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX returned 8.00%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for HLMIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LZIEX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HLMIX.

Performance

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZIEX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than HLMIX's 14.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX has underperformed HLMIX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while HLMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.

LZIEX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

HLMIX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 14.76%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	9.76%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio	14.76%	27.63%	1.18%	15.10%	-20.21%	8.49%	20.33%	25.22%	-13.96%	29.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LZIEX and HLMIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996	0.89

The correlation between LZIEX and HLMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LZIEX vs. HLMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 30
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

HLMIX

HLMIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
HLMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HLMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
HLMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
HLMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HLMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LZIEX	HLMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.06	-0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.85	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.82	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	10.78	-4.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the HLMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZIEX and HLMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LZIEX	HLMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	2.06	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.42	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.59	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.38	+0.01

Drawdowns

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, roughly equal to the maximum HLMIX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZIEX and HLMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZIEX	HLMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-58.03%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.88%	-10.44%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-13.98%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.42%	-32.76%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-32.76%	-2.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	0.00%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-12.70%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.73%	+0.68%

Volatility

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) is 4.66%, while Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio (HLMIX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that LZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZIEX	HLMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	5.15%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.25%	12.02%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.98%	14.49%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	15.93%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	16.49%	-0.36%

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZIEX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than HLMIX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZIEX vs. HLMIX - Dividend Comparison

LZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, less than HLMIX's 13.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLMIX Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio	13.02%	14.94%	7.14%	3.79%	2.51%	2.48%	0.75%	1.59%	1.50%	1.64%	0.98%	1.02%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.25%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZIEX and HLMIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, LZIEX and HLMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LZIEX or HLMIX?

HLMIX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to LZIEX (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZIEX dropped -55.35% vs HLMIX's -58.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.