LZIEX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
LZIEX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Oct 29, 1991. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio | -2.03% | 34.14% | 5.30% | 16.49% | -15.00% | 6.14% | 8.76% | 21.20% | -13.71% | 22.82% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 5.00% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZIEX achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LZIEX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 7.05%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.
LZIEX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 20.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
LZEMX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- 5.00%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 39.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZIEX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LZIEX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
LZIEX
LZEMX
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZIEX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.74 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 3.49 | -1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.53 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 3.47 | -1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 13.04 | -7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZIEX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.74 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.38 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between LZIEX and LZEMX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
LZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.61%, more than LZEMX's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio | 12.61% | 12.35% | 8.26% | 3.78% | 6.12% | 17.81% | 1.03% | 2.07% | 7.93% | 1.42% | 1.06% | 0.72% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.95% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZIEX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZIEX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -60.08% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.88% | -10.61% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.42% | -30.55% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -44.08% | +8.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.64% | -10.42% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -16.71% | +5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility
LZIEX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.92%. This indicates that LZIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LZIEX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 5.92% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 9.63% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 14.26% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 14.09% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 16.33% | -0.29% |