PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLFOX vs. LCSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLFOX achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than LCSIX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GLFOX has outperformed LCSIX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while LCSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.50% annualized return.


GLFOX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.60%
6M
3.72%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
9.75%
ALL TIME*
10.57%

LCSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-1.47%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
0.01%
3Y*
-2.32%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
2.50%
ALL TIME*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.09%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
0.93%1.13%-8.29%-3.07%6.04%14.90%9.90%-5.97%15.16%6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GLFOX and LCSIX is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLFOX vs. LCSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSIX
LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) and LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLFOXLCSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.00

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

-0.04

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

-0.09

+4.15

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the LCSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLFOX and LCSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.65%, which is greater than LCSIX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLFOX and LCSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLFOXLCSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.65%

-25.13%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-4.97%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.01%

-11.60%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-13.21%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.65%

-13.21%

-16.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.00%

-10.39%

+4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-6.41%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.32%

+1.03%

Volatility

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) at 1.92%. This indicates that GLFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLFOXLCSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.92%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

4.23%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

6.05%

+4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

5.53%

+5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

6.66%

+6.53%

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLFOX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LCSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLFOX vs. LCSIX - Dividend Comparison

GLFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than LCSIX's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.12%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.30%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLFOX and LCSIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLFOX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to LCSIX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLFOX dropped -29.65% vs LCSIX's -25.13%.

GLFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLFOX and LCSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer