LYFT vs. MANH
LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) and MANH (Manhattan Associates, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, LYFT returned -22.11%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for MANH. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LYFT vs. MANH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than MANH's 10.41% return.
LYFT
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- -22.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -20.73%
MANH
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 30.70%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- -12.88%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | $195.20M | $172.22M | $199.91M |
| $192.14M | $150.10M | $107.01M |
LYFT vs. MANH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -18.12% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 14.20% | -50.69% |
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc. | 10.41% | -35.87% | 25.51% | 77.36% | -21.92% | 47.83% | 31.89% | 46.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYFT and MANH is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019 | 0.38 |
The correlation between LYFT and MANH shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYFT:
$6.02B
MANH:
$11.32B
LYFT:
$6.95
MANH:
$3.49
LYFT:
2.28
MANH:
54.88
LYFT:
0.00
MANH:
2.61
LYFT:
1.00
MANH:
10.24
LYFT:
2.11
MANH:
72.31
LYFT:
$6.52B
MANH:
$1.13B
LYFT:
$2.82B
MANH:
$301.44M
LYFT:
$51.76M
MANH:
$290.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYFT vs. MANH — Risk / Return Rank
LYFT
MANH
LYFT vs. MANH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYFT | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.29 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | -0.47 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYFT vs. MANH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -90.84%, roughly equal to the maximum MANH drawdown of -87.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and MANH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYFT | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.84% | -87.04% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.51% | -45.10% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.23% | -60.98% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.80% | -60.98% | -24.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.82% | -38.23% | -43.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.60% | -39.54% | -29.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.44% | 27.44% | +4.00% |
Volatility
LYFT vs. MANH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) is 12.06%, while Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) has a volatility of 24.18%. This indicates that LYFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MANH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYFT | MANH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.06% | 24.18% | -12.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.83% | 40.82% | -4.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.41% | 46.73% | +4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.54% | 39.92% | +27.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.89% | 40.28% | +27.61% |
Dividends
LYFT vs. MANH - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYFT nor MANH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LYFT vs. MANH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and Manhattan Associates, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYFT vs. MANH - Profitability Comparison
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
MANH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of -155.57M and revenue of 297.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -52.2%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
MANH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.23M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
MANH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 50.35M and revenue of 297.79M, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYFT and MANH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANH has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to LYFT (12.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -90.84% vs MANH's -87.04%.
LYFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYFT and MANH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer