MANH vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MANH (Manhattan Associates, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, MANH returned 12.74%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MANH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MANH has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.74%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.

MANH

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 26.69%
• 6M: 26.72%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 1Y: -10.85%
• 3Y*: -0.04%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 12.74%
• ALL TIME*: 12.71%

SMH

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 33.97%
• YTD: 50.09%
• 1Y: 90.95%
• 3Y*: 50.56%
• 5Y*: 33.46%
• 10Y*: 34.16%
• ALL TIME*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc.	$192.14M	$150.10M	$107.01M
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.28B	$7.64B	$7.07B

MANH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc.	10.41%	-35.87%	25.51%	77.36%	-21.92%	47.83%	31.89%	88.22%	-14.47%	-6.58%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	50.09%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and SMH is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000	0.49

The correlation between MANH and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MANH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MANH

MANH Risk / Return Rank: 33
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 36

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MANH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MANH	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	2.29	-2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	2.70	-2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.36	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	3.58	-3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	14.64	-15.11

MANH vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MANH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MANH	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.04%	-84.96%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.10%	-24.62%	-20.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.98%	-35.74%	-25.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.98%	-45.30%	-15.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.98%	-45.30%	-15.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.23%	-19.19%	-19.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.54%	-40.89%	+1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.44%	6.01%	+21.43%

Volatility

MANH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) has a higher volatility of 24.18% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 14.70%. This indicates that MANH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MANH	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.18%	14.70%	+9.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.82%	33.13%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.73%	38.57%	+8.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.92%	36.50%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.28%	33.32%	+6.96%

Dividends

MANH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

MANH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MANH and SMH in my portfolio?

MANH and SMH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MANH or SMH?

MANH has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to SMH (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANH dropped -87.04% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.