PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANH vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MANH vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a -12.76% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MANH has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 8.50%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.


MANH

1D
-2.48%
1M
7.41%
YTD
-12.76%
6M
-15.34%
1Y
-19.14%
3Y*
-6.58%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
8.50%

SMH

1D
0.90%
1M
25.87%
YTD
77.13%
6M
75.61%
1Y
157.20%
3Y*
64.17%
5Y*
39.21%
10Y*
37.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANH vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
-12.76%-35.87%25.51%77.36%-21.92%47.83%31.89%88.22%-14.47%-6.58%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
77.13%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and SMH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between MANH and SMH has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANH vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANH
MANH Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANH vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MANHSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

5.19

-5.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

5.22

-5.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.72

-0.78

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

10.59

-11.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.73

40.63

-41.36

MANH vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MANHSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

5.19

-5.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

1.13

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

1.16

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.34

-0.12

Drawdowns

MANH vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANHSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.04%

-84.96%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.97%

-14.93%

-32.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.98%

-35.74%

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.98%

-45.30%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.98%

-45.30%

-15.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.19%

0.00%

-51.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.44%

-41.09%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.20%

3.89%

+22.31%

Volatility

MANH vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.47%. This indicates that MANH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANHSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

11.47%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.59%

24.29%

+8.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.49%

30.56%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.16%

35.01%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.44%

32.57%

+6.87%

Dividends

MANH vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

MANH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


MANH and SMH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MANH has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to SMH (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANH dropped -87.04% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANH and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer