MANH vs. AVGO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO).

Performance

MANH vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MANH vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc.	-23.19%	-35.87%	25.51%	77.36%	-21.92%	47.83%	31.89%	88.22%	-14.47%	-6.58%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	-10.38%	50.63%	110.49%	104.18%	-13.27%	56.48%	44.88%	29.05%	2.18%	48.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MANH : $8.07B AVGO : $1.51T
EPS MANH : $3.61 AVGO : $5.13
PE Ratio MANH : 36.85 AVGO : 60.31
PEG Ratio MANH : 1.75 AVGO : 0.75
PS Ratio MANH : 7.50 AVGO : 22.06
PB Ratio MANH : 25.65 AVGO : 18.94
Total Revenue (TTM) MANH : $1.08B AVGO : $68.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) MANH : $602.74M AVGO : $46.31B
EBITDA (TTM) MANH : $292.21M AVGO : $36.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a -23.19% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's -10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MANH has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 8.86%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 38.12% annualized return.

MANH

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: -23.19%
• 6M: -35.06%
• 1Y: -23.07%
• 3Y*: -4.92%
• 5Y*: 1.94%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

AVGO

• 1D: 5.49%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: -10.38%
• 6M: -5.81%
• 1Y: 86.36%
• 3Y*: 71.23%
• 5Y*: 48.36%
• 10Y*: 38.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MANH vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANH

MANH Risk / Return Rank: 19
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 21

AVGO

AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 86
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANH vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MANH	AVGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	1.80	-2.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	2.52	-3.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.33	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.53	2.95	-3.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	7.31	-8.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MANH vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and AVGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MANH	AVGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	1.80	-2.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	1.15	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.98	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	1.06	-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and AVGO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MANH vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

MANH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MANH Manhattan Associates, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	0.80%	0.70%	0.94%	1.71%	3.02%	2.24%	3.05%	3.54%	3.11%	1.87%	1.43%	1.13%

Drawdowns

MANH vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and AVGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MANH	AVGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.04%	-48.30%	-38.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.11%	-28.67%	-15.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.87%	-41.15%	-17.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.87%	-48.30%	-10.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.03%	-24.75%	-32.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.34%	-8.00%	-31.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.41%	11.56%	+8.85%

Volatility

MANH vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) have volatilities of 12.27% and 12.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MANH	AVGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.27%	12.64%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.38%	32.48%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.16%	48.26%	-8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.73%	42.34%	-4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.34%	38.91%	+0.43%

Financials

MANH vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MANH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of 147.11M and revenue of 270.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.4%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.16B and revenue of 19.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.

MANH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.01M and revenue of 270.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 8.56B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.3%.

MANH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 51.95M and revenue of 270.39M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 7.35B and revenue of 19.31B, resulting in a net margin of 38.1%.