PortfoliosLab logo
MANH vs. AVGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and AVGO is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MANH vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4,129.99%
17,768.08%
MANH
AVGO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MANH:

-0.28

AVGO:

0.94

Sortino Ratio

MANH:

-0.06

AVGO:

1.71

Omega Ratio

MANH:

0.99

AVGO:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

MANH:

-0.23

AVGO:

1.47

Martin Ratio

MANH:

-0.53

AVGO:

4.08

Ulcer Index

MANH:

23.40%

AVGO:

14.82%

Daily Std Dev

MANH:

46.03%

AVGO:

62.86%

Max Drawdown

MANH:

-87.04%

AVGO:

-48.30%

Current Drawdown

MANH:

-39.68%

AVGO:

-16.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MANH:

$11.17B

AVGO:

$943.78B

EPS

MANH:

$3.50

AVGO:

$2.16

PE Ratio

MANH:

52.57

AVGO:

92.93

PEG Ratio

MANH:

3.30

AVGO:

0.54

PS Ratio

MANH:

10.63

AVGO:

17.31

PB Ratio

MANH:

45.43

AVGO:

13.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

MANH:

$1.05B

AVGO:

$42.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MANH:

$584.33M

AVGO:

$27.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

MANH:

$276.42M

AVGO:

$19.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a -30.85% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's -10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MANH has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 13.44%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 36.25% annualized return.


MANH

YTD

-30.85%

1M

29.85%

6M

-34.13%

1Y

-12.93%

5Y*

19.54%

10Y*

13.44%

AVGO

YTD

-10.11%

1M

33.16%

6M

13.68%

1Y

58.68%

5Y*

53.93%

10Y*

36.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MANH vs. AVGO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MANH is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MANH is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MANH is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MANH is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MANH is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MANH is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AVGO is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AVGO is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MANH vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and AVGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.28
0.94
MANH
AVGO

Dividends

MANH vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

MANH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
1.08%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%1.22%

Drawdowns

MANH vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and AVGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.68%
-16.42%
MANH
AVGO

Volatility

MANH vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) is 16.87%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 21.71%. This indicates that MANH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.87%
21.71%
MANH
AVGO

Financials

MANH vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
262.79M
14.92B
(MANH) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MANH vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
56.4%
68.0%
(MANH) Gross Margin
(AVGO) Gross Margin
MANH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of 148.22M and revenue of 262.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.15B and revenue of 14.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.0%.

MANH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.17M and revenue of 262.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 6.26B and revenue of 14.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.0%.

MANH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 52.58M and revenue of 262.79M, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 5.50B and revenue of 14.92B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.