PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANH vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MANH vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANH achieves a -13.12% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 26.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MANH has underperformed ANET with an annualized return of 8.33%, while ANET has yielded a comparatively higher 42.93% annualized return.


MANH

1D
-0.41%
1M
6.68%
YTD
-13.12%
6M
-15.69%
1Y
-21.11%
3Y*
-6.63%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
8.33%

ANET

1D
-4.79%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
26.70%
6M
29.14%
1Y
74.86%
3Y*
59.83%
5Y*
49.95%
10Y*
42.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANH vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
-13.12%-35.87%25.51%77.36%-21.92%47.83%31.89%88.22%-14.47%-6.58%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
26.70%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MANH and ANET is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between MANH and ANET has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MANH:

$9.04B

ANET:

$211.46B

EPS

MANH:

$3.57

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

MANH:

42.17

ANET:

56.86

PEG Ratio

MANH:

2.01

ANET:

1.34

PS Ratio

MANH:

8.30

ANET:

21.79

PB Ratio

MANH:

44.06

ANET:

15.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MANH:

$1.10B

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MANH:

$456.06M

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

MANH:

$297.27M

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANH vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANH
MANH Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MANH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MANH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANH vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MANHANETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.25

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

2.66

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

5.57

-6.38

MANH vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANH Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANH and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MANHANETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

1.42

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

1.07

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.96

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.84

-0.62

Drawdowns

MANH vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANH drawdown since its inception was -87.04%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANH and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANHANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.04%

-52.20%

-34.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.97%

-28.33%

-18.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.98%

-50.42%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.98%

-50.42%

-10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.98%

-52.20%

-8.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.39%

-6.59%

-44.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.44%

-15.40%

-24.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.28%

13.48%

+12.80%

Volatility

MANH vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) is 15.81%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 21.64%. This indicates that MANH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANHANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.81%

21.64%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.58%

39.68%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.47%

52.88%

-14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.14%

47.09%

-8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.43%

44.91%

-5.48%

Dividends

MANH vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

Neither MANH nor ANET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MANH vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
282.22M
2.71B
(MANH) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MANH vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
61.9%
Portfolio components
MANH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 282.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

MANH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported an operating income of 64.94M and revenue of 282.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

MANH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Associates, Inc. reported a net income of 49.30M and revenue of 282.22M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MANH and ANET have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (21.64%) compared to MANH (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANH dropped -87.04% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANH and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer