LXU vs. RSST
LXU (LSB Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Over the past year, LXU returned 63.37% vs 56.38% for RSST. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LXU vs. RSST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LXU achieves a 51.65% return, which is significantly higher than RSST's 21.75% return.
LXU
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -15.75%
- YTD
- 51.65%
- 6M
- 41.49%
- 1Y
- 63.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
RSST
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 56.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LXU vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 51.65% | 11.99% | -18.47% | -8.37% |
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF | 21.75% | 19.91% | 18.37% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LXU and RSST is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023 | 0.27 |
The correlation between LXU and RSST shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LXU vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank
LXU
RSST
LXU vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LXU | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 4.84 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 17.09 | -10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LXU | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.56 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.95 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
LXU vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LXU drawdown since its inception was -97.83%, which is greater than RSST's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXU and RSST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LXU | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.83% | -30.80% | -67.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.71% | -11.71% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.05% | -0.70% | -64.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -6.02% | -50.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.01% | 3.31% | +6.70% |
Volatility
LXU vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison
LSB Industries, Inc. (LXU) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) at 4.15%. This indicates that LXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LXU | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.15% | 4.15% | +12.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.35% | 15.34% | +26.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.95% | 22.14% | +32.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.43% | 24.15% | +38.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.75% | 24.15% | +49.60% |
Dividends
LXU vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison
LXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LXU LSB Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF | 0.92% | 1.12% | 0.09% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LXU and RSST have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LXU has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to RSST (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXU dropped -97.83% vs RSST's -30.80%.
RSST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LXU and RSST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer