PortfoliosLab logo
RSST vs. RSSB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSST and RSSB is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

RSST vs. RSSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-15.04%
-7.25%
RSST
RSSB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSST:

-0.52

RSSB:

0.20

Sortino Ratio

RSST:

-0.55

RSSB:

0.41

Omega Ratio

RSST:

0.93

RSSB:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

RSST:

-0.48

RSSB:

0.23

Martin Ratio

RSST:

-1.61

RSSB:

1.01

Ulcer Index

RSST:

9.29%

RSSB:

3.60%

Daily Std Dev

RSST:

28.82%

RSSB:

18.23%

Max Drawdown

RSST:

-30.80%

RSSB:

-16.09%

Current Drawdown

RSST:

-23.24%

RSSB:

-8.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a -15.90% return, which is significantly lower than RSSB's -3.01% return.


RSST

YTD

-15.90%

1M

-8.26%

6M

-13.99%

1Y

-14.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RSSB

YTD

-3.01%

1M

-4.09%

6M

-6.66%

1Y

3.29%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSST vs. RSSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSST has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSB's 0.41% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for RSST: current value is 1.04%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RSST: 1.04%
Expense ratio chart for RSSB: current value is 0.41%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RSSB: 0.41%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSST vs. RSSB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSST is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSST is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSST is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSST is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSST is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSST is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSSB is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSST vs. RSSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSST, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RSST: -0.52
RSSB: 0.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSST, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
RSST: -0.55
RSSB: 0.41
The chart of Omega ratio for RSST, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RSST: 0.93
RSSB: 1.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSST, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RSST: -0.48
RSSB: 0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for RSST, currently valued at -1.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
RSST: -1.61
RSSB: 1.01

The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the RSSB Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and RSSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00Dec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06
-0.52
0.20
RSST
RSSB

Dividends

RSST vs. RSSB - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than RSSB's 1.30% yield.


Drawdowns

RSST vs. RSSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than RSSB's maximum drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and RSSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-23.24%
-8.89%
RSST
RSSB

Volatility

RSST vs. RSSB - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) at 11.90%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.77%
11.90%
RSST
RSSB