PortfoliosLab logo
RSST vs. RSSB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSST and RSSB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

RSST vs. RSSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSST:

-0.33

RSSB:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

RSST:

-0.41

RSSB:

0.81

Omega Ratio

RSST:

0.95

RSSB:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

RSST:

-0.40

RSSB:

0.56

Martin Ratio

RSST:

-1.04

RSSB:

2.25

Ulcer Index

RSST:

11.72%

RSSB:

4.00%

Daily Std Dev

RSST:

28.61%

RSSB:

18.66%

Max Drawdown

RSST:

-30.80%

RSSB:

-16.09%

Current Drawdown

RSST:

-17.40%

RSSB:

-2.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than RSSB's 4.26% return.


RSST

YTD

-9.50%

1M

5.72%

6M

-9.64%

1Y

-10.13%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RSSB

YTD

4.26%

1M

3.46%

6M

0.30%

1Y

9.97%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSST vs. RSSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSST has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSB's 0.41% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSST vs. RSSB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSST is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSST is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSST is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSST is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSST is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSST is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSSB is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSSB is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSSB is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSSB is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSST vs. RSSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the RSSB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and RSSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RSST vs. RSSB - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than RSSB's 1.21% yield.


Drawdowns

RSST vs. RSSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than RSSB's maximum drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and RSSB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RSST vs. RSSB - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) at 3.96%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...