PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSST vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSST vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 29.79% return.


RSST

1D
1.26%
1M
1.13%
6M
10.06%
YTD
14.96%
1Y
47.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.03%

RSSY

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.37%
6M
24.35%
YTD
29.79%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.69M$3.70M$3.80M
$536.26K$678.90K$712.12K

RSST vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSST and RSSY is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024

0.54

The correlation between RSST and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSST vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSST
RSST Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSST vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSSTRSSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

4.53

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

14.80

-4.33

RSST vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSST vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, roughly equal to the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSTRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-29.57%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-7.36%

-4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-3.07%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-6.94%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.25%

+1.70%

Volatility

RSST vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.97%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSTRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

2.97%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

9.21%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

13.83%

+9.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

18.04%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.24%

18.04%

+6.20%

RSST vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSST vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than RSSY's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSST
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF
0.98%1.12%0.09%0.93%
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
1.57%2.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSST and RSSY have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSST has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to RSSY (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSST dropped -30.80% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 47.14% vs 36.02% for RSSY. On fees, RSST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 47.14% return vs 36.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.98% for RSST.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RSST and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSST and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer