LVS vs. EFA
LVS (Las Vegas Sands Corp.) is a stock, while EFA (iShares MSCI EAFE ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, LVS returned 2.28%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for EFA. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LVS vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVS achieves a -24.06% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LVS has underperformed EFA with an annualized return of 2.28%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.
LVS
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- 6M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- -24.06%
- 1Y
- -4.57%
- 3Y*
- -4.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.89%
EFA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24B | $1.12B | $1.39B | |
| $309.11M | $241.94M | $234.03M |
LVS vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | -24.06% | 29.45% | 6.21% | 3.15% | 27.71% | -36.85% | -11.95% | 39.54% | -21.62% | 36.16% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.69% | 31.55% | 3.49% | 18.36% | -14.39% | 11.45% | 7.60% | 22.04% | -13.82% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVS and EFA is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2004 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LVS and EFA has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVS vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank
LVS
EFA
LVS vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVS | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.18 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 8.23 | -8.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVS vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVS drawdown since its inception was -99.02%, which is greater than EFA's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVS and EFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVS | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.02% | -61.04% | -37.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.85% | -11.42% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.73% | -14.05% | -31.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.18% | -29.53% | -21.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.77% | -34.19% | -24.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.30% | -0.62% | -45.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.93% | -11.86% | -38.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.55% | 3.02% | +15.53% |
Volatility
LVS vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 4.69%. This indicates that LVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVS | EFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 4.69% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 13.71% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.54% | 15.79% | +18.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.63% | 16.62% | +24.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 17.00% | +21.75% |
Dividends
LVS vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
LVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EFA's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% |
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | 2.25% | 1.54% | 1.56% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 4.46% | 5.76% | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVS and EFA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVS has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to EFA (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVS dropped -99.02% vs EFA's -61.04%.
EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVS and EFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer